Casio continues their 500 and 300 series of Grand Hybrid digital pianos with the GP-510 and GP-310 in 2024 which are the replacements for the previous discontinued models GP-500 and GP-300. The Grand Hybrid line includes just these 2 models. These hybrid piano models are the first 2 serious digital pianos for Casio developed in a joint venture by Casio and the famous Bechstein grand piano of Germany.
*SPECIAL UPDATE: For the month of August or when supplies run out at Casio warehouse, whichever comes first, Casio currently has an instant “factory rebate” on these 2 model’s which they rarely do. If you decide that either model will best fit your musical needs and budget, then before you purchase anything anywhere, contact us right away because not only can we help you get that instant factory rebate, but also an extra discount beyond that one!
I have done many reviews on those lower priced Casio models under $4000 and Casio is a leader in that price range. But a Casio for about $4300 and upwards to over $6000?…I thought there is just no way they could compete in that space. But was I ever wrong about that! They now definitely offer a very impressive piano playing experience that’s hard to find in this price range, and in fact they offer more piano playing realism in some ways than the more well known name brands in this price range, and for less money too. Think you should not consider one of these new Casio Grand Hybrid digital pianos…then I suggest you ought to “think again” because you may be surprised at what you find from these 2 Grand Hybrid models built in collaboration with the Bechstein grand piano company of Germany.
Bechstein pianos had become the norm in many concert halls and private
mansions.
By that time three piano makers, all of which were founded in 1853, became established as the industry leaders across the world and they were Bechstein, Blüthner and Steinway & Sons. So the Bechstein brand was in very good company:). In 1881 Bechstein began supplying pianos to Queen Victoria and a gilded art-case piano was delivered to Buckingham Palace followed by several more Bechstein pianos to Windsor Castle and other royal residences. By January 1886 they were among the piano manufacturers holding was called “a Royal Warrant” as a supplier to the Queen. Several British embassies across the world acquired Bechstein pianos and they are still popular across the world today and used by professional pianists in concert. However, that brand is not as well known in America as they are in Europe and other parts of the world.
What this all means is that the wood key action movement in the Casio Grand Hybrid pianos is directly from the Bechstein piano company and built for the new Casio GP piano series and the keys themselves are authentic full size grand piano keys made from real spruce-wood from individual spruce trees in Austria (wow, that’s pretty cool!). From what I have learned, the natural wood is precision cut and aged slowly over the time so that the keys in the key action can remain solid, aligned, and playable over years of practice and performance. Attached to the wood key action inside these Grand Hybrid models is a moving hammer mechanism designed to imitate real hammers in an acoustic grand piano.
This moving hammer mechanism is made from resin and synthetic compounds, etc that can withstand weather and humidity changes so that the hammers will last almost indefinitely without the need for adjustment or maintenance as you would otherwise have in a real acoustic piano. When the hammers move as you are pressing a key, you can actually feel the weight of those keys under your fingers and direct connection of the moving hammer mechanism inside the piano as counterweights to the keys which gives the player a feeling of natural expression and being directly connected to the music in a way that digital pianos without moving full length hammers cannot really do.
The hammers in the Grand Hybrid pianos don’t actually strike any strings in the piano because there are no strings (the piano sound is digitally reproduced)…and that’s one of the positive aspects of a digital piano…no strings to tune and maintain which otherwise can be very costly over many years.
When I played both the GP-310 and GP-510 for long periods of time, it was like I was actually playing a real grand piano in many ways and the feeling was pretty amazing for a digital piano. I will say that this key action does not feel “exactly” like a real full size acoustic grand piano because that type of thing would require a real full size acoustic grand piano key action. I should know because I play full size acoustic grand pianos from Steinway, Bosendorfer, Yamaha, Kawai, and others. The Grand Hybrid pianos have a “simulated” grand piano key action but for most people this Bechstein Grand Hybrid key action will very enjoyable to play and give you the feeling that you are playing the real thing. One of the reasons for this is because the action has extra long keys (aka: key sticks) inside the piano and the balance points of the action are well done.
The key action feels smooth, balanced, easy and responsive to play without being too firm or too light. So the overall playing experience in my opinion is more like playing a natural grand piano than nearly all of the other digital piano brands in this price range in this price range, and I have had other advanced piano players tell me that as well. It is interesting to note that this Bechstein GP key action does not have the notched escapement/let-off feel that you would normally experience and associate with playing a real grand piano when playing the keys very lightly and softly, but there is a reason for this. I was told that the Bechstein company wanted the fastest responding acoustic piano style action that was possible to get in a digital piano.
As a reference and comparison, the only other top name pianos with actual moving piano hammers in a digital piano is the Yamaha Avant Grand series of digital pianos including the NU1X, N1X, N2, and N3X as well as the Kawai NV5S upright and NV10S with grand piano action. However, these pianos all use wood hammers, wood hammer shanks, and wooden organic connective parts which are very good and just like an acoustic piano but will likely require more maintenance over time. As an example, the Yamaha NU1X (left pic – see-through front is for display purposes only) upright style piano sells for $7400 at local store discount price and it has an upright console hammer key action but not a grand piano key action, and there is a very big difference between the two types. Beyond that, the NU1X has very few sounds and very few digital options and features so it’s a very, basic digital piano in that way, although the cabinet is attractive in its polished ebony finish.
The higher priced Yamaha N1X ($9,800 discount price) has a grand piano style action (as I mentioned earlier) with all wood parts, but would likely require more maintenance over time as I mentioned earlier. The Yamaha N1X AvantGrand is an exceptionally nice digital piano but is still quite a bit more money than the Casio GP-310 and GP-510. The Yamaha N2 and N3X go way up in price from the N1X and all have the same key actions as the N1X and pretty much the same basic features with a few exceptions.
So when it comes to a key action mechanism in a digital piano, this new Casio Celviano Grand Hybrid GP-310 and GP-510 (GP-510 in polished ebony, above left pic) in my opinion is ahead of the Yamaha upright NU1X in a number of ways and somewhat competitive to the higher priced Yamaha AvantGrand N1X, N2, and N3X pianos, although the Yamaha N series Grand Key actions are the “real deal” and more organic and natural as compared to the Casio’s…but they should be given their much higher prices.
The GP-510 and GP-310 have the industry standard 256-note polyphony processing power which is important in helping to give the player enough power to play more complex pieces of music without the loss of notes or damper sustain. As far as piano sound authenticity goes, all of the major digital piano companies would claim to have the best piano sound in their digital pianos and certainly Casio is no exception. What else would you expect them to say?! Casio wants you to believe they have the best piano sound found in these new hybrid digital pianos and overall I believe they have done a very good job and I was impressed.
Since the Casio GP series is designed in cooperation with the Bechstein piano company of Germany, it is easy to understand why the three main piano sounds in the GP series are so good. I found each piano sound sample to be unique with their own qualities of tone and dynamic range, but yet they were all enjoyable to play. What did impress me most about the piano sounds were their dynamic range of tone and the ability to really express yourself across all tonal ranges depending on your touch and finger movement.
The German Bechstein sound was also impressive to me and more natural and realistic in a delicate way than many of the competitive brands, especially the new Roland LX series digital pianos. In my opinion the Casio Grand Hybrid piano sounds are noticeably more natural, more organic, have a wider dynamic tonal range, and just give you the feeling that you are not playing a digital piano.
As far as the operating system goes, Casio incorporated a side panel control unit with LCD display which is very similar to what Kawai and Yamaha are currently using in their digital pianos. Although this is a simple and elegant design created to reduce the “digital look” of the buttons and controls of the piano and make it more minimalistic, I would prefer an attached lid or cover on that panel so you wouldn’t see it at all when the piano is not in use or you just don’t want to change controls while playing and don’t want to see the panel. Regardless, the control panel still looks good, is minimal in design, and I found that using the controls was fairly easy to do (although there is still a small learning curve) and the display screen was, overall, easy to read and buttons were easy to use.
The feature set and sound library in the higher priced GP-510 includes 35 instrument sounds (the GP-310 has 28 sounds) which include acoustic pianos, strings, choirs, organs, harpsichords, etc. Theses sounds can be layered 2 at a time, split with 2 different instruments one on the left side and one on the right side, duet piano mode for 2-person simultaneous play, registration preset “scene” mode for saving your own setups or using preset factory setups for instant play, lots of different hall/reverb settings which really adds to the realism of the piano sound along with adjustable touch sensitivity, brilliance, and DSP which helps the user/player create a customizable piano sound and action response. There are a number of specific organic piano sound elements which Casio/Bechstein incorporates into the GP-510 which allows the piano sounds to be even more natural and organic.
This feature is called the “Acoustic Simulator” and would include things like adjustable Hammer Response, Damper Resonance, String Resonance, Aliquot Resonance (this feature is found in fine grand pianos and adds to the harmonic richness and clarity of the piano sound), Open String Resonance, Lid Simulator, Key Off Simulator, Damper Noise, Key On Action
When it comes to adding some “fun” to this model, Casio has a new feature called “Concert Play” which means that you can select from up to 15 songs that are full orchestral CD quality renditions of famous classical music that you can listen to and play along with. You can even slow down the concert song while you try to learn it as well as rewind, fast forward, and loop a set of measures together for repeat play.
The piano also has 2 headphone jacks for private play along with USB output to device for iPad and computer connectivity and USB flashdrive input for song play and recording, and also two regular MIDI connectors for those people who have MIDI music gear that they want to connect to the piano. Casio included 1/4″ input and output audio jacks for connecting external devices to enhance the piano sound even further through external speakers or use the internal speaker system to amplify other sound devices such as computers, tablets, MP3 players, etc.
There are other functions and features on the GP-510 and GP-310 but those are secondary things as compared with what I believe it this digital piano’s primary purpose and goal…to offer an impressive grand piano playing experience in a beautiful polished ebony cabinet with folding key cover, full size music rack, opening lid and matching bench along with a complete 5 year factory warranty on manufacturer defects if they should ever occur. The GP-510 is only available in polished ebony finish, so if you want a non-polished ebony color, the GP-310 come in matte black as well as a very attractive matte white.
Based on what I have seen for many years on all of the other digital pianos that Casio has produced and the overall quality and “bang for the buck” they have brought to the table, I believe Casio has a great future in this premium category for higher priced digital pianos with the introduction of their upgraded Grand Hybrid series in cooperation with the Bechstein Piano Company.
Casio has not, in the past, had the prestige or gravitas of a digital piano name like Yamaha, Kawai, or Roland. I know that, they know that, and many piano shoppers know that. But a name means somewhat less these days considering how much great technology is being developed by
digital piano companies who were not as well known before with having higher priced premium piano products, such as these Grand Hybrid pianos. Even though Casio is very well known in the lower priced digital piano keyboard world, they were definitely not known for having digital pianos which compete with the highest price range for Kawai, Yamaha, or Roland digital pianos…but now they do so I believe the wait was worth it.
GP-310 matte black |
As for the other Casio-Bechstein model GP-310 ($4299 price), the piano sound is very realistic with natural organic tonal elements including a full dynamic range of sound from very soft to very loud and in-between with smooth volume transitions. But the GP-510 goes beyond it with added “resonating tonal elements” to make it even more realistic & impressive but that model sells for $2000 more than the GP-310 so I would expect it to be better.
After putting the Grand Hybrid’s through their paces I agree that these models would make an excellent addition to anyone’s home, church, school, or studio as long as they understand that the Grand Hybrid digital pianos are primarily designed to be purchased in place of an acoustic grand piano and are not heavy on additional features so does not have wireless, Bluetooth, dozens of extra instrument sounds, drum patterns, automatic interactive chords, General MIDI recording or playback, multi-track sequencer, and no proprietary iPad apps like some other digital pianos do.
However, with USB to device connectivity you can plug in a USB cable and use many MIDI iPad apps with full MIDI/USB interaction from a Grand Hybrid to the iPad along with Bluetooth audio connectivity using a 3rd party Bluetooth adapter plugged into the piano audio input so that music from your iPad/Android device can stream directly through the GP-510 speaker system. Also, it has been my experience that direct connectivity using a USB cable is more stable than with internal Bluetooth connectivity.
GP-510 polished ebony |
As far as I am concerned, at 171 lbs in weight with cabinet dimensions of approximately 56″ x 19″x 38″ the very attractive matte finish GP-310 and polished ebony GP-510 are pianos I would definitely own if I wanted to focus squarely on the best possible grand piano playing experience that Casio-Bechstein has to offer along with being a more minimalistic looking instrument which adds to the overall elegance of these pianos. The Bechstein key action hammer system is not available in any brand of digital piano and you won’t get a moving grand piano hammer mechanism until you get to the Yamaha AvantGrand N1X which sell a price of $9,999.
The appearance of the GP-310 and GP-510 are also attractive in that when you prop open the lid of the piano to let the sound come out more, you see an attractive red material covering the inside piano top and you can actually see the moving piano hammers through two long rectangular windows in the top of the piano while you are playing the keys. It’s a very cool visual experience along with having a beautiful piece of furniture.
There is one thing I find to be a bit odd when it comes to the GP-510 and that is the height adjustable black bench included with the piano does not match the high gloss black piano finish. The bench is a single size satin black (non-gloss) finish and even though an adjustable height bench is very nice to have, I am a bit baffled by the lack of a matching high gloss finish on the bench. Is this an oversight on the part of Casio or what? I just don’t understand the reason for this but it’s something which can be easily corrected if Casio chooses to do that which I recommend that they do. The satin black bench is fine for their satin (matte) black pianos and it’s also ok for the GP510 high gloss model. But it would have been better for the GP-510 if the bench was high gloss as well.
Features
|
GP-310
|
GP-510
|
Upgrades
|
Polyphony
|
256
|
256
|
|
Total sounds
|
26 incl strings, organs, harpsichord, etc
|
35 incl strings, organs, harpsichord, etc
|
New Harpsichord tone
|
Main piano sounds
|
Berlin,
Hamburg, Vienna |
Berlin,
Hamburg, Vienna |
Longer piano sustain/decay time
|
Total grand pianos
|
12
|
14
|
Better legato response
|
Grand hammer action
|
Yes
– individual keys |
Yes
– individual keys |
|
Full length grand keys
|
Acoustic
grand keys |
Acoustic
grand keys |
|
Graded-weighted keys
|
Yes,
medium weight |
Yes,
medium weight |
|
Austrian wooden keys
|
Aged
organic spruce |
Aged
organic Spruce |
|
Grand fulcrum point
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Acrylic white keytops
|
Yes
– grand style |
Yes
– grand style |
|
Phenol black keytops
|
Yes
– grand style |
Yes
– grand style |
|
Key Center Pin
|
Yes
– grand style |
Yes
– grand style |
|
Grand hammers
|
Resin
– full movement |
Resin
– full movement |
|
Hardware
resonator |
No
|
Yes
– affects each key |
|
Triple key sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Key force detection
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Hammer response
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
String resonance
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Lid simulator system
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Open string resonance
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Aliquot resonance
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Key on action noise
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
added to GP-310
|
Key off action noise
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
added to GP-310
|
Brilliance control
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Hall-reverb simulator
|
Yes
– 12 types |
Yes
– 12 types |
|
DSP & chorus effects
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Headphone
Mode |
Yes
– surround sound |
Yes
– surround sound |
|
Touch response
|
Yes
– 5 levels |
Yes
– 5 levels |
|
Tuning
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Stretch tuning effects
|
Yes
– 5 types, off |
Yes
– 5 types, off |
|
Temperaments
|
Yes
– 17 types |
Yes
– 17 types |
|
Grand pedal system
|
Yes
– weighted |
Yes
– weighted |
|
Pedaling
|
Continuous
detection |
Continuous
detection |
improved soft pedal response & sustain pedal decay time
|
Adjustable half-damp
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Damper resonance
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Damper noise
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Transpose
|
Yes
– 2 octaves |
Yes
– 2 octaves |
|
Duet mode
|
Yes
– adjust 2 octaves |
Yes
– adjust 2 octaves |
|
Octave shift
|
Yes
– adjust 4 octaves |
Yes
– adjust 4 octaves |
|
Concert play mode
|
Yes
– 15 songs + user |
Yes
– 15 songs + user |
Added “relative volume control”
|
Music Library
|
Yes
– 60 + 10 user |
Yes
– 60 + 10 user |
|
MIDI & audio recorder
|
Yes
– 2 track, 1 track |
Yes
– 2 track, 1 track |
|
Scene registrations
|
No
|
Yes
– 15 preset, 10 usr |
|
Metronome
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Layer/Split 2 sounds
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Backlit LCD display
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Easier to read
|
USB Flash drive input
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
USB output to device
|
Yes
– plug & play |
Yes
– plug & play |
|
MIDI input/output
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Dual audio ins/outs
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
added a “disable speaker” mode
|
Headphone jacks
|
Yes – 2
|
Yes – 2
|
|
Volume sync EQ
|
Yes – 3 types, off
|
Yes – 3 types, off
|
Added Master EQ
|
Speakers
|
2 x 6.3″+ 2 x 4″ + 2 x 2″
|
2 x 6.3″+ 2 x 4″ + 2 x 2″
|
New speaker design, richer tone & more bass
|
Amplifiers
|
30w x 2 + 20w x 2
|
30w x 2 + 20w x 2
|
|
Cabinet dimensions
|
57″ x 19″ x 38″
|
57″ x 19″ x 38″
|
|
Cabinet weight
|
171 lbs
|
171 lbs
|
|
Bench
|
Yes – height adjustable
|
Yes – height adjustable
|
If you want more info on New Digital Pianos & Lower pricing, including on the new Casio Grand Hybrids, please email me at tim@azpianowholesale.com or call direct at 602-571-1864.
You say that "the GP300…does not sound as realistic as the GP500" — The only differences I've read about on various piano forums are the polished ebony cabinet and the "scene" feature on the GP500 (which can in fact be replicated on the GP300, albeit with some manual tweaking of settings). In looking at the specs you posted, it appears that the GP300 lacks "Hardware resonator" (?) "Open string resonance", "Aliquot resonance", and "Key on/off action noise". Otherwise, the two models have the same sound engine/amp/speakers. Is the sound yet that different? Why would that be?
I think it might be because of the open and aliquot string resonances that the 300 does not feature?
^ Tim is right, although there does not seem to be any good reason for the difference in sound quality given the published technical specs. I've played both the 500 and 300 and there is a clear difference in sound quality with the 3 main pianos from the 500 to 300. To my ear, they aren't even in the same league. IMHO the 300 isn't acceptable at all as far as the piano sounds, especially at this price point.
Has anyone played the 400 yet?
I had the chance to play the GP500 next to a NU1, N1 and N2.
(when I say play, I mean press keys, but anyways)
The N2 gives definite vibrations as feedback into the key.
N1 and NU1 do that too, a bit less so.
I didn't feel much in the GP500. Is there a setting that can adjust that, or doesn't this feature exist at all?
Is there a difference in sound between the 400 and the 500?
Is there anywhere in the NY area I can find these yet to play them?
I don't know. Local dealers throughout the US and what pianos they offer is not my specialty. You can call the manufacturer corporate US office and ask them.
Tim, I have the possibility to buy the Roland LX-17, but it seems to me, after reading this review, that this CASIO GP500 is better or at least the quality of the keyborad is better
Since I live in Europe and for some reasons I have not the possibility to try both these pianos, may I ask you which piano do you prefer?
I am a student of conservatory and I have a limited budget
Thanks
I had the same question as Pietro's of April 19 above. Also, does having wood keys raise a maintenance issue that the LX-17 would not have? Also, does the LX-17 sound better than the GP500? Finally, would having external bi amped speakers improve the sound of either or both of the GP500 or LX-17?
A lot of your comparison between the GP500 and the N2 factored in cost as a consideration. Question: if cost were not a consideration at all, which is the better electric piano, GP-500 or N2? and why? Would really appreciate your advice because that's what I'm trying to decide right now and having a hard time.
I am looking forward to reading your point of view of the new Casio GP-510, especially compared to the first GP-500 hybrid grand pianos.
Some people have said that these pianos don't properly sustain notes for long enough
, and don't have enough power for many headphones. I want to like these, the action seems so cool. Any thoughts on that? I would think that the price may drop since they introduced new models (the 510 and 310).
Yes, I would also appreciate hearing the about the difference between the 500, (which i own thanks to you 🙂 and the 510. And whether an upgrade would be worth it.
I also wonder if anyone else finds it annoying that the buttons on the left control panel are not illuminated. Between the relative darkness of the room while playing/performing and the bright light of the music lamp I need to pull out a small flashlight to see any of the control buttons.
Thanks,
Kevin
I checked out GP-310 and 510 in local showroom. In fact the sound on 510 has broader range of dynamic frequency, higher highs and lower lows, so sound comparison wasn't even close. I am very excited for my G-510 delivery sometime this or next week!!
Hello
I would also like to hear about the difference between the 500 and the 510 please. Thank you so much for these impeccable reviews. After reading them you have no questions left and a good sense of what the specificities of each models are.
This is by far the most comprehensive review of Casio GP-510 and GP-310 series on the internet. Thank you for such a fair review of Casio's effort to challenge other top competitors in the hybrid-piano category. I'm now seriously considering buying either Casio GP-310 or GP-510 since, for me, it's the action that matters the most. It would be a serious investment for a beginner but I think Casio's hybrid are the best value-packed products in this price point.
Hi Tim! How do you compare the gp 510 to clp 775? Here in Brazil both has a similar price. How would you buy? 😅
This or Kawai’s CA501?
This is a good question. The key action on the Casio GP models is impressive and many people like it. It is a firmer/heavier key action than the Kawai model and some people enjoy the lighter, fast action keys on the Kawai. Both Casio and Kawai have a similar internal speaker system with 100 watts of power…but Kawai has a surround sound system with speakers coming out of the top of the piano whereas Casio lid opens up a bit. I really like the Kawai piano sampling technology & choices. As far as the digital technology with the cool “bells & whistles,” Kawai is far ahead of Casio is those ways in my opinion. Either model would be a good choice. Just depends on what you want to do with your music and your focus and experience with piano playing
Hi Tim,
I have my piano in a small/medium room and am worried that the loudness of the GP310 on at least a half volume is going to cause too much resonance and hence muddiness of the sound through the speakers. Do you find this so, compared to the Kawai CA701/901? I currently play the Yamaha CLP745 and find that even on half volume, the sound is sometimes quite overwhelming. But when I turned down the volume further, the piano sound seems muted and changes in quality. Thank you!
Thank you for the very detailed review of the GP series. This is the best information that I have found on the Internet. After all, I bought the GP-510. It works great in the past week and I’m more than satisfied. The reason is that its action is absolutely much better than the other options in this price range.
Previously I have considered Yamaha’s CLP 745/775. The reason I went away from it is because my fingers have a bumpy feeling when pressing down the keys. It’s also a bit heavier than I wanted.
Then I considered Kawai’s CA701. It was my top choice before I found casio’s GP series. the CA series feels lighter than others and should be very easy to play. But the downward travel distance is a bit too far. I have small hands and it makes my fingers easier to touch the edge of other keys.
The GP’s key edges are better rounded than the yamaha/kawai. Overall, it’s travel distance, weight curve, touch and edge’s smoothness are all much better than yamaha/kawai.
Last tip, the GP is really heavy. You’d better have two men to lift it for assembly. You need two strong men to move it upstairs.
I had a GP 400 Hybrid Casio Grand I bought in 2018 and enjoyed it but I was not a fan of the action to the piano and saw some new reviews on the new GP 510 and was wondering about what has been improved about the piano. I aso didnt like the damper pedals it seemed very hard to play that on the piano but I loved the tones . even though they dont make the 400 any more I am very curious what the price on the new 510 is and do you have any financing available. I would be interested if tat was available. I have always liked the Hybrid Kawaiis too with the soundboard and their piano action too. Anyway I think you may be the cheapest piano seller of this type pianos . What abobut Shipping?